Absolute Return Funds: Higher Fees, Lower Returns

The financial markets were definitely disrupted in 2008-2009, which is a little scary for investors but industry disruptions often lead to new innovations. Some new products are good, others are bad and some could be good but just have really bad execution. Today’s article is about a great idea that can be done well or very poorly.

Video Analysis: Absolute Return Funds

“Absolute return funds” is the title given to a growing mutual fund segment currently promising above inflation returns with smooth profitable performance. This is a compelling marketing pitch considering the concerns about inflation and volatility in the market today.

The funds are proposing to deliver these returns and stability though active management and asset class diversification.

The active management for this style of fund can be described as pretty extreme. The fund managers will use market timing techniques to move from short to long positions and changing exposure levels to different asset classes as they see fit.

This level of flexibility is usually associated with hedge funds. Of course, all this flexibility comes at a steep price in fees that can really add up.

For example, the Putnam Absolute Return Fund 500 will charge you 5% to buy and 2.25% annual fees to compensate management. That seems a little extreme and can soak up a lot of profits.

Paying 2.25% per year means that in 10 years you will have paid the management team almost 17% of your total portfolio regardless of returns. High fees and big promises are typical of this style of fund.

The question becomes whether the manager’s talent can actually make those high fees worthwhile. Evidence would suggest that it is not worth it.

For example, we searched the Putnam site for other funds managed by the Absolute Return Fund 500 manager to see what his track record was like. Of the first 5 funds we found, he had not been able to outperform reasonable benchmarks in the long term. This certainly throws doubt on their forecasted performance within this new series of funds.

This is typical of most of these kinds of funds. They charge a lot and have very nice marketing materials but fail to deliver results. For a little more detail about the average performance of managed funds compared to indexed funds, here is a great report from the University of Albany.

Active management is expensive and on average does not outperform passive indexing. However, it is important to keep in mind that the strategic ideas of asset class diversification is still a good one.

The good news is that you don’t need to pay anyone exorbitant fees to do this kind of investing. If you want to diversify your portfolio beyond stocks and into bonds, commodities, options, forex etc. you can do it with indexed ETFs and funds. Keep your fees and learn how to do this kind of investing by starting here.


Image courtesy Hitchster.


This article is produced by Learning Markets, LLC. The materials presented are being provided to you for educational purposes only. The content was created and is being presented by employees or representatives of Learning Markets, LLC. The information presented or discussed is not a recommendation or an offer of, or solicitation of an offer by Learning Markets or its affiliates to buy, sell or hold any security or other financial product or an endorsement or affirmation of any specific investment strategy. You are fully responsible for your investment decisions. Your choice to engage in a particular investment or investment strategy should be based solely on your own research and evaluation of the risks involved, your financial circumstances and your investment objectives. Learning Markets and its affiliates are not offering or providing, and will not offer or provide, any advice, opinion or recommendation of the suitability, value or profitability of any particular investment or investment strategy.

Any specific securities, or types of securities, used as examples are for demonstration purposes only. None of the information provided should be considered a recommendation or solicitation to invest in, or liquidate, a particular security or type of security.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, charges, expense, and unique risk profile of an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) carefully before investing. Leveraged and Inverse ETFs may not be suitable for all investors and may increase exposure to volatility through the use of leverage, short sales of securities, derivatives and other complex investment strategies. These funds’ performance will likely be significantly different than their benchmark over periods of more than one day, and their performance over time may in fact trend opposite of their benchmark. Investors should monitor these holdings, consistent with their strategies, as frequently as daily. A prospectus contains this and other information about the ETF and should be obtained from the issuer. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of mutual fund carefully before investing. Mutual funds are subject to market fluctuation including the potential for loss of principal. A prospectus contains this and other information about the fund and is available from the issuer. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Detailed information on the risks associated with options can be found by downloading the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options and Supplements (PDF) from The Options Clearing Corporation, or by calling the Options Clearing Corporation at 1-888-OPTIONS.